No Weed Walking Without Helpers

- some resources for weed recognition - in the order of my learning
   First there were books: Or, before that, there was my mother, from whom I learned the names of flowers. And my grandfathers, Gustaf Persson with his hospitable garden (last house before the meadows) and Gustav Ekeblad with his growing collection of wildflowers: HE could even tell us the names of different grasses. So there were footsteps to walk in.
   But the books have been there for a long time as well. As a child and teenager I spent many summer hours with grandfather Gustaf's copy of Ursing's  Svenska Växter (printed in 1945) - fascinated in a bookish way by the keys, playing around with them as a kind of decoding game. That worn old copy is now in my hands. Together with the almost as old copy of Bolin & von Post's  Floran i färg (first published in 1950) Ursing was the resource closest at hand when I started these S-weed walks. I had used the same two books as guides for the compulsory 200 wildflowers to be captured on cards under plastic when I was in the teacher education program back in the 80s.
   I got the Bolin & von Post as a prize at school when I was twelve. Since it didn't have a key, just pictures and descriptions, I somehow respected it less than grandpa's Ursing at the time. Later as I cultivated more of a practical interest in identifying wild flowers that I had actually SEEN, the crisp drawings were quite useful, for filling in distinctions in the expanding lattice of what I could tell without helpers.
   Then there was the Web: For an online pursuit like the S-weeds it has been natural to also look for identification resources on line. I soon found my way to Den Virtuella Floran at the Swedish Museum of Natural History - an excellent resource for Swedish-speakers, with many useful pointers to distinguishing characteristics between easily confused species. Another set of botanical images of Swedish origin - but now widespread on the Net - is Lindman's Bilder ur Nordens Flora - beautiful illustrations, but often oldfashioned naming practices (it was printed in 1917). These images and texts have been on the Web since 1992, part of the early explorations in Projekt Runeberg. The rest of my Websearching has yielded more randomly visited results. I plan to put some of the links into a list.
   Last but not least there are people: Some five months into the weed walks, a growing sense of too much uncertainty about too many difficult identifications of withered winter weeds told me that books and other canned resources just weren't enough: I needed people. (That might not surprise YOU as much as it surprised me.) As is my preferred way, I consulted the Web and used email - and was lucky to receive a friendly response and some asked-for corrections from Roger Eriksson, researcher and webmaster at the Botanical Institute of Göteborg University. What more, he put me in contact with Botaniska föreningen i Göteborg and its truly remarkable secretary, Erik Ljungstrand.
   Browsing through my site you will notice that I have taken some care to say thanks to people for all sorts of contributions (mostly in electronic form) - and that Erik's name is by far the most commonly occurring in this context. In fact, his name would have been on many more pages - it just started to look too repetitious to mention it as often as warranted. Erik has been, and still is an invaluable resource - he has an incredible eye for botanical detail (in images and in the field) and the most astonishing memory for the relevant facts. Best of all, he seems to enjoy answering my endless questions - and some of the things that I find by surveying my domain so closely have turned out to be rarities to cherish.


    And then books again: Learning from the botanists of Göteborg has brought more books into the game. For one thing, I observe that in the field (excursions outside my weed domain) they still swear by the keys of Krok & Almquist, Svensk Flora. (I've still got my mother's old copy from school.) For another thing, I have finally updated from my old guide books to a more current flora: Mossberg, Stenberg & Eriksson, Den Nordiska Floran - which allows me to upgrade my naming practices to the 90s (there's a new edition coming soon, but I just HAD to have it) - and makes me drool with envy at the watercolor illustrations by Mossberg. It also ups the ante of my weed identification by including numerous subspecies. That's roughly where I am at the moment of the closing of the first S-weed year: learning at the level of Nordiska Floran. I also overhear the botanists (I go to excursions, where I take a lot of pictures of people taking pictures) talking about further channels for keeping at the cutting edge of the (everchanging) naming practices, but I'm still waiting for the first signs in myself of wishing to be that much in the know. (How correct do I want my craft to be?) (Uhm: in 2004 I guess I'm getting there. Oh, and when it came, I promptly bought the new, augmented edition of Mossberg & Stenberg, Den Nya Nordiska Floran. Not forgetting the Flora Nordica, Västergötlands Flora, et cetera, et cetera...)
   So. All in all, and with these helpers and more, my approach to the Weeds has been a long, intermittent process of learning, reinforced twelvefold this year of weed walking. Weed life has become so much richer in my eyes - but I STILL can't tell apart other than a few characteristic grasses! (This, in 2004, is changing, too - but slowly).

Entrance
Chronologi
Scientific names

Latest weed




©Eva Ekeblad, Göteborg 2001